Comfort
It’s important to acknowledge that smoking is an addiction to many smokers. One simply can’t not smoke because it’s inconvenient, because of the addictive nature of the action. So when an individual ‘needs’ to smoke, it’s often highly uncomfortable to go outside to smoke, especially in Idaho due to the harsh seasons. In the summer for someone to have to subject him or herself to extreme heat when wanting/needing to smoke is highly unnecessary, when an indoor heated/cooled smoking room could be easily acquired. The comfort of the non-smokers seems to always be thought of because they never chose to smoke, however smokers and non-smokers are all people, therefore it’s important to consider the comfort of everyone.
It’s important to acknowledge that smoking is an addiction to many smokers. One simply can’t not smoke because it’s inconvenient, because of the addictive nature of the action. So when an individual ‘needs’ to smoke, it’s often highly uncomfortable to go outside to smoke, especially in Idaho due to the harsh seasons. In the summer for someone to have to subject him or herself to extreme heat when wanting/needing to smoke is highly unnecessary, when an indoor heated/cooled smoking room could be easily acquired. The comfort of the non-smokers seems to always be thought of because they never chose to smoke, however smokers and non-smokers are all people, therefore it’s important to consider the comfort of everyone.
This is one woman's stance on smoking bans, in which she mentions having to 'leave to have a cigarette' and the negative aspects of.
If there was a smoking area or room this individual and others similar would not have to deal with the inconvenience of having to go outside to smoke.
Reducing Secondhand smoke
Many opposing sides argue that passing no smoking laws will reduce most to all SHS, and prevent the risk of allowing SHS into the main ventilation system, the way a smoking lounge could. The fault in this hypothesis is the reality that illegally smoking indoors is quite common, usually due to the inconvenience of going all the way outside. Why would people go in a smoking room if not outside? Often if people have a convenient option that eliminates the worry of getting a fine, they will choose this option simply because it's easy. Much of what appeals to the tenth-first century is convenience: if it's not convenient to go outside to smoke, people won't do it, putting everyone around them at risk. Therefore if there is a convenient option, it will be easier, in turn drastically reducing SHS in Idaho's public places, because people will not need to pollute the air to achieve conveniently smoking. * as stated in tab ‘Secondhand Smoke’ *
If there was a smoking area or room this individual and others similar would not have to deal with the inconvenience of having to go outside to smoke.
Reducing Secondhand smoke
Many opposing sides argue that passing no smoking laws will reduce most to all SHS, and prevent the risk of allowing SHS into the main ventilation system, the way a smoking lounge could. The fault in this hypothesis is the reality that illegally smoking indoors is quite common, usually due to the inconvenience of going all the way outside. Why would people go in a smoking room if not outside? Often if people have a convenient option that eliminates the worry of getting a fine, they will choose this option simply because it's easy. Much of what appeals to the tenth-first century is convenience: if it's not convenient to go outside to smoke, people won't do it, putting everyone around them at risk. Therefore if there is a convenient option, it will be easier, in turn drastically reducing SHS in Idaho's public places, because people will not need to pollute the air to achieve conveniently smoking. * as stated in tab ‘Secondhand Smoke’ *